<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Website Development &#8211; Six Reasons to avoid Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/</link>
	<description>Let&#039;s Talk Wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Toronto Web Design</title>
		<link>http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdomtalks.com/?p=164#comment-659</guid>
		<description>At a seminar that I gave last winter, I told a group of marketing people that if they were considering Flash Intros that they should seriously reconsider this choice. About half of the group had &quot;uh oh&quot; looks on their faces and put their heads down. They had all planned Flash Intros and had no idea why these intros are a huge mistake.

Flash intros are the bane of users. Users hate waiting for them to load and about 90% of users skip them anyway. Whenever I see a Flash Intro, I bail out of the site because I don&#039;t want to wait for the site to load. This means you are losing site traffic right away and users aren&#039;t ever getting an opportunity to view your products or services pages. We always tell our clients not to use them because, besides being usability nightmares, they usually cost quite a bit and don&#039;t add any value to your site.

Perhaps the only audience who actually watches these things are marketing people. That&#039;s because these pieces are vanity spots touting a company&#039;s value. Your users aren&#039;t marketing people and your Flash Intro is not going to convince them to buy your products or services. Plus, users have seen so many of these in the &#039;90s that they are no longer cool.

Do your bottom line and your users a huge favor and don&#039;t add a Flash Intro to your site. Your traffic will improve dramatically and so should your sales and leads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a seminar that I gave last winter, I told a group of marketing people that if they were considering Flash Intros that they should seriously reconsider this choice. About half of the group had &#8220;uh oh&#8221; looks on their faces and put their heads down. They had all planned Flash Intros and had no idea why these intros are a huge mistake.</p>
<p>Flash intros are the bane of users. Users hate waiting for them to load and about 90% of users skip them anyway. Whenever I see a Flash Intro, I bail out of the site because I don&#8217;t want to wait for the site to load. This means you are losing site traffic right away and users aren&#8217;t ever getting an opportunity to view your products or services pages. We always tell our clients not to use them because, besides being usability nightmares, they usually cost quite a bit and don&#8217;t add any value to your site.</p>
<p>Perhaps the only audience who actually watches these things are marketing people. That&#8217;s because these pieces are vanity spots touting a company&#8217;s value. Your users aren&#8217;t marketing people and your Flash Intro is not going to convince them to buy your products or services. Plus, users have seen so many of these in the &#8217;90s that they are no longer cool.</p>
<p>Do your bottom line and your users a huge favor and don&#8217;t add a Flash Intro to your site. Your traffic will improve dramatically and so should your sales and leads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdomtalks.com/?p=164#comment-249</guid>
		<description>I have flash on my website, but it doesn&#039;t include the products I&#039;m selling.  I have it on there as a &quot;wow&quot; factor when you &quot;come through the front door.&quot;  I&#039;m finding a few SEO issues with it, but overall I&#039;ve been happy and have no plans to take it down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have flash on my website, but it doesn&#8217;t include the products I&#8217;m selling.  I have it on there as a &#8220;wow&#8221; factor when you &#8220;come through the front door.&#8221;  I&#8217;m finding a few SEO issues with it, but overall I&#8217;ve been happy and have no plans to take it down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Jensen Website Services</title>
		<link>http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Jensen Website Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdomtalks.com/?p=164#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Flash is a good technology, but I have never seen anything as misused as flash.  This is especially true with commercial websites who have the budget to pay somebody to make the website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash is a good technology, but I have never seen anything as misused as flash.  This is especially true with commercial websites who have the budget to pay somebody to make the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khuram</title>
		<link>http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Khuram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdomtalks.com/?p=164#comment-241</guid>
		<description>@rainwebs

I am surprised with the anger you are showing. Every one can have different viewpoint and experience.

We are here to help each other. If I have some wrong experience with some application, it doesn&#039;t mean every one to agree with.

You can see many comments against and some have even more reasons to not use Flash like @gino.

I am not against using Flash, neither i am of opinion that problems in a technology cannot be overcome. Please be positive and help the friends like @gino to get their problems solved about Flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rainwebs</p>
<p>I am surprised with the anger you are showing. Every one can have different viewpoint and experience.</p>
<p>We are here to help each other. If I have some wrong experience with some application, it doesn&#8217;t mean every one to agree with.</p>
<p>You can see many comments against and some have even more reasons to not use Flash like @gino.</p>
<p>I am not against using Flash, neither i am of opinion that problems in a technology cannot be overcome. Please be positive and help the friends like @gino to get their problems solved about Flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gino</title>
		<link>http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>gino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdomtalks.com/?p=164#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Flash player is not available on iPhone. I don&#039;t remember the status of other mobile platforms, but I would consider this a huge drawback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash player is not available on iPhone. I don&#8217;t remember the status of other mobile platforms, but I would consider this a huge drawback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rainwebs</title>
		<link>http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>rainwebs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 01:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdomtalks.com/?p=164#comment-239</guid>
		<description>phurlong, thanks for this important comment. The article on its own is too much irritating.

Interesting to me is that this is one of those articles that tries to write against a phenomenon that can&#039;t be stopped. And even better, it tries to list technical arguments against it. If you have a look at what the customers demand is you can&#039;t win with all your standardized markup in the future. There are already requirements that can&#039;t be done in HTML, AJAX, etc. So, we build mixed implementations where parts are already in Flash today. The next step is thinking about to get a better desktop behavior. So, a full-blown Flash application is the next logical step.

The adoption of Flex shows that this will change the frontend development dramatically in the next years. Discussions about the support of a back button become absurd, because the browser becomes a desktop that shows a single application window. All navigation is done by the application itself and not the browser. S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phurlong, thanks for this important comment. The article on its own is too much irritating.</p>
<p>Interesting to me is that this is one of those articles that tries to write against a phenomenon that can&#8217;t be stopped. And even better, it tries to list technical arguments against it. If you have a look at what the customers demand is you can&#8217;t win with all your standardized markup in the future. There are already requirements that can&#8217;t be done in HTML, AJAX, etc. So, we build mixed implementations where parts are already in Flash today. The next step is thinking about to get a better desktop behavior. So, a full-blown Flash application is the next logical step.</p>
<p>The adoption of Flex shows that this will change the frontend development dramatically in the next years. Discussions about the support of a back button become absurd, because the browser becomes a desktop that shows a single application window. All navigation is done by the application itself and not the browser. S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khuram</title>
		<link>http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Khuram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 06:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdomtalks.com/?p=164#comment-236</guid>
		<description>May be you are right Phurlog.

I will revise the article after making due re-search on points you have mentioned. 

I highly appreciate your concern, and i hope you will read other articles also and give your valuable comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be you are right Phurlog.</p>
<p>I will revise the article after making due re-search on points you have mentioned. </p>
<p>I highly appreciate your concern, and i hope you will read other articles also and give your valuable comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mycall</title>
		<link>http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>mycall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdomtalks.com/?p=164#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Here is another reason.. it doesn&#039;t work in Firefox under 64-bit Vista or Windows 2008 (and probably not Windows 7 either)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another reason.. it doesn&#8217;t work in Firefox under 64-bit Vista or Windows 2008 (and probably not Windows 7 either)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phurlong</title>
		<link>http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>phurlong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdomtalks.com/?p=164#comment-234</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t agree more with you on that, it&#039;s just the way the article was written, it seems to assume that these point where not possible to realise with Flash Development, i just wanted to give a point of the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t agree more with you on that, it&#8217;s just the way the article was written, it seems to assume that these point where not possible to realise with Flash Development, i just wanted to give a point of the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khuram</title>
		<link>http://wisdomtalks.com/website-development-six-reasons-to-avoid-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Khuram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdomtalks.com/?p=164#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Dear Phurlong

Under Every point, you described, you admitted that these issue are there but can be ignored to some extent using techniques.

I don&#039;t want to stop Web Developers using Flash, but just want them to take care of these points. And I highly appreciate your response and comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Phurlong</p>
<p>Under Every point, you described, you admitted that these issue are there but can be ignored to some extent using techniques.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to stop Web Developers using Flash, but just want them to take care of these points. And I highly appreciate your response and comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

